Can You File a Claim for Emotional Distress After an Accident in Illinois?

April 20, 2025

Can You File a Claim for Emotional Distress After an Accident in Illinois?

If you've been in an accident, the physical injuries may be just the beginning of your suffering. Many victims in Illinois also experience emotional distress—anxiety, depression, insomnia, and even PTSD—that can impact their daily lives just as deeply. But can you actually file a claim for emotional distress after an accident in Illinois?



The short answer is yes—but with some important qualifications. At Halliday McCall, we assist individuals in Peoria who are navigating the emotional and legal challenges that follow serious accidents. Here's what you need to know about filing an emotional distress claim in Illinois.


What Is Emotional Distress in a Legal Context?


Emotional distress refers to psychological suffering resulting from a traumatic event, such as a car accident, slip and fall, or workplace injury. This can include:


  • Anxiety and panic attacks
  • Depression
  • Sleep disturbances
  • Fear of driving or leaving home
  • Flashbacks or nightmares


Illinois law allows emotional distress damages to be claimed in both intentional tort and negligence cases, but the standards of proof vary.


Emotional Distress in Negligence Cases


If your emotional distress stems from a negligent act (like a careless driver causing a crash), Illinois generally requires that it be accompanied by a physical injury or a direct impact. This is known as the “impact rule.”

In some cases, courts may allow recovery for emotional harm without a physical injury—but this is more limited and typically reserved for plaintiffs who directly witnessed a traumatic event involving a close family member (known as a “zone of danger” case).


Emotional Distress in Intentional Tort Cases


Illinois courts are more open to emotional distress claims when the harm was caused intentionally. This includes:

  • Assault
  • Battery
  • Intentional infliction of emotional distress (IIED)

To prevail in an IIED claim, you must prove the defendant’s conduct was extreme and outrageous, and that it caused severe emotional suffering.


Proving Emotional Distress


Whether your case involves negligence or intentional wrongdoing, documenting emotional distress is crucial. You may need:


  • Medical records from therapists, psychologists, or psychiatrists
  • Testimony from mental health professionals
  • Testimony from family or friends who observed changes in your behavior


Why Legal Guidance Matters


Emotional distress claims can be complex, and insurance companies often try to undervalue or dismiss them. At Halliday McCall, we work with clients throughout Peoria to evaluate the strength of their claims and pursue fair compensation for the full scope of their injuries—both physical and emotional.


If you're struggling emotionally after an accident, don’t dismiss it as something you just have to “deal with.” You may have the right to pursue compensation—and we can help.

A close up of a judge 's gavel on a black table.
May 20, 2025
Wondering how long you have to file a personal injury claim in Illinois? Learn about the statute of limitations and get help from Halliday McCall in Peoria.
A black and white photo of a row of semi trucks parked in a parking lot.
March 19, 2025
Involved in a truck accident in Illinois? Learn who can be held liable—from truck drivers to trucking companies—and how Halliday McCall helps Peoria residents pursue compensation.
A black suv and a white van are driving down a wet city street.
February 27, 2025
Learn what steps to take immediately after a car accident in Illinois to protect your legal rights. From documenting the scene to seeking legal advice, Halliday McCall helps Peoria residents navigate personal injury claims.
December 15, 2024
Understanding Nursing Home Abuse in Illinois: What You Need to Know
November 15, 2024
Who Can File a Wrongful Death Lawsuit in Illinois?
October 14, 2024
Understanding the Statute of Limitations for Car Accidents in Illinois
April 18, 2023
How Compensation is Calculated in an Illinois Personal Injury Case
March 26, 2023
Understanding Liability in an Illinois Truck Accident: Who Pays for Your Injuries?
February 21, 2023
Who is Liable in a Ridesharing Accident?
By Patrick Halliday November 29, 2022
Most dogs are friendly, and most dog owners are responsible, but dog attacks do happen from time to time. If you've been the victim of an attack, or your own dog has been involved in an incident, there are numerous issues surrounding liability and negligence. The owner or controller of the dog can be held liable in the event of personal injury or property loss. Various laws are relevant depending on the circumstances and jurisdiction of the attack. Based on data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), over 4.5 million people are bitten by dogs annually. This results in 800,000 injuries that require medical attention and accounts for roughly one-third of all homeowners insurance liability claims. In the majority of these situations, the person who owns the dog is held responsible. However, a third party can also be liable. If you need legal assistance in  Peoria, Illinois  or elsewhere in Illinois for a dog attack, please contact our legal team today. Liability for dog owners In most cases, dog owners are liable for any injuries their pets cause. This includes situations where the owner knew the dog had a tendency to cause that kind of injury, or where the injury was caused by unreasonable carelessness on part of the owner. In these cases, the victim needs to prove negligence. It also includes situations where the owner is held liable automatically, whether or not they knew the dog had a tendency to cause that kind of injury. In these cases, the victim of a dog attack does not need to prove negligence to receive compensation. Two major factors decide whether or not the victim needs to prove negligence: the details of the dog attack and the jurisdiction where it occurred. Along with these details, certain factors can remove or alter liability for the dog owner. For example, if the victim provoked the animal or was trespassing on the property, the owner may not be automatically held liable. However, the dog owner may still be responsible for paying medical bills, lost wages, property damage, and pain and suffering. Other factors can also influence liability, including dogs handled in a professional capacity as part of law enforcement or military programs. There are three types of laws that impose liability on dog owners: Dog-bite statute - Under this statute, the dog owner is held liable for any injury or property damage caused by the dog. This statute is upheld automatically, and it's not based on provocation. Violation of this statute results in strict liability rather than negligence. One-bite rule - In some jurisdictions, liability is based on history and knowledge of previous vicious incidents. However, some states have moved away from the one-bite rule, with owners held responsible for any injury regardless of history. Negligence laws - Situations that involve potential negligence can be complex, with legal support often required. The dog owner or person caring for the dog is liable when the injury occurred due to unreasonable care in the context of controlling the dog. Liability for third parties In most cases, regardless of where the attack occurred, the dog owner is legally responsible for all bites and injuries caused by their animal. However, someone else can be held liable together with the dog owner in the following situations: A third party who had care or control over the dog, including dog sitters and dog walkers A dog owner who is less than 18 years of age A property owner (dog owner's landlord) who knew the dog was dangerous but didn't act Liability for third parties is related to common law and strict liability rules. Under common law, liability is based on negligence, either from the dog owner or a third party who is caring for the dog. This also applies to strict liability cases, where dog-bite statutes define an "owner" as someone who's keeping a dog. This includes the person who owns the dog or anyone else who harbors the animal. Differences between states In the US, most jurisdictions impose statutory strict liability for dog attacks. This makes the dog owner legally liable to the victim by default. Dog-bite statutes that impose strict liability date back to the 1700s, and they're still used in the majority of states. The one-bite rule applies in just 14 states: ID, ND, SD, WY, NV, KS, NM, TX, AR, MS, VA, MD, VT, and AK. In another five states, mixed rules apply, including laws based on negligence: OR, NY, TN, NC, and GA. If you need legal assistance in  Peoria, Illinois  or elsewhere in Illinois, we are here to help. Please reach out to us if you were the victim of a dog attack.
More Posts