Who is Liable in a Ridesharing Accident?

February 21, 2023

Who is Liable in a Ridesharing Accident?

Ridesharing services, such as Uber and Lyft, have become increasingly popular due to their convenience and affordability. While rideshare services provide many benefits, they also pose some challenges when it comes to liability for accidents. If you or someone you know has been injured in an accident involving a rideshare service in Illinois, it’s important to understand your legal rights and who may be liable for the damages incurred. 


Who is Responsible?

 

The question of who is responsible for a ridesharing accident will depend on several factors, including the status of the driver at the time of the accident, whether the driver has commercial insurance coverage from the ridesharing company, and if any other third parties were involved in the accident. It’s important to note that Uber and Lyft both offer liability insurance policies that provide coverage for passengers injured in an accident. In most cases, if you are injured while riding in an Uber or Lyft vehicle, you can file a claim with either one of these companies. 


In addition to Uber and Lyft’s insurance coverage options, there may be other parties that are liable for your injuries depending on what happened during the accident. For example, if you were involved in an accident caused by another driver who was not using a rideshare service at the time of the crash, then that driver may be held liable for your injuries. Similarly, if a manufacturer produced faulty auto parts which contributed to the cause of an accident involving a rideshare vehicle, then that manufacturer may also be held responsible for any damages incurred. 


What Can I Do?

 

If you have been injured in an accident involving a ridesharing service such as Uber or Lyft, then it is important to speak with an experienced attorney as soon as possible so that they can assess your situation and advise you on how best to proceed with filing your claim. At Halliday we have extensive experience handling car accidents involving rideshare services and are here to help individuals get fair compensation for any injuries sustained during these types of accidents. Our team will work diligently to investigate all potential sources of liability so that we can ensure our clients receive maximum compensation under Illinois law.     


No one should have to suffer financial losses due to someone else’s negligence or recklessness on the road; however when it comes to accidents involving rideshare services this can become even more complicated than normal car accidents due to multiple sources of liability that may be involved. At Halliday we understand how complex these cases can be and are dedicated to helping those who have been injured in a car accident while using a rideshare service obtain full compensation under Illinois law through thorough investigation into all potential sources of liability. If you or someone you know has been injured while using a ridesharing service then please contact us today so we can discuss your legal rights and work together towards getting fair compensation for your injuries!

A close up of a judge 's gavel on a black table.
May 20, 2025
Wondering how long you have to file a personal injury claim in Illinois? Learn about the statute of limitations and get help from Halliday McCall in Peoria.
A man and a woman are hugging each other in front of a mirror.
April 20, 2025
Can you sue for emotional distress after an accident in Illinois? Learn how victims in Peoria can file emotional distress claims with guidance from Halliday McCall.
A black and white photo of a row of semi trucks parked in a parking lot.
March 19, 2025
Involved in a truck accident in Illinois? Learn who can be held liable—from truck drivers to trucking companies—and how Halliday McCall helps Peoria residents pursue compensation.
A black suv and a white van are driving down a wet city street.
February 27, 2025
Learn what steps to take immediately after a car accident in Illinois to protect your legal rights. From documenting the scene to seeking legal advice, Halliday McCall helps Peoria residents navigate personal injury claims.
December 15, 2024
Understanding Nursing Home Abuse in Illinois: What You Need to Know
November 15, 2024
Who Can File a Wrongful Death Lawsuit in Illinois?
October 14, 2024
Understanding the Statute of Limitations for Car Accidents in Illinois
April 18, 2023
How Compensation is Calculated in an Illinois Personal Injury Case
March 26, 2023
Understanding Liability in an Illinois Truck Accident: Who Pays for Your Injuries?
By Patrick Halliday November 29, 2022
Most dogs are friendly, and most dog owners are responsible, but dog attacks do happen from time to time. If you've been the victim of an attack, or your own dog has been involved in an incident, there are numerous issues surrounding liability and negligence. The owner or controller of the dog can be held liable in the event of personal injury or property loss. Various laws are relevant depending on the circumstances and jurisdiction of the attack. Based on data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), over 4.5 million people are bitten by dogs annually. This results in 800,000 injuries that require medical attention and accounts for roughly one-third of all homeowners insurance liability claims. In the majority of these situations, the person who owns the dog is held responsible. However, a third party can also be liable. If you need legal assistance in  Peoria, Illinois  or elsewhere in Illinois for a dog attack, please contact our legal team today. Liability for dog owners In most cases, dog owners are liable for any injuries their pets cause. This includes situations where the owner knew the dog had a tendency to cause that kind of injury, or where the injury was caused by unreasonable carelessness on part of the owner. In these cases, the victim needs to prove negligence. It also includes situations where the owner is held liable automatically, whether or not they knew the dog had a tendency to cause that kind of injury. In these cases, the victim of a dog attack does not need to prove negligence to receive compensation. Two major factors decide whether or not the victim needs to prove negligence: the details of the dog attack and the jurisdiction where it occurred. Along with these details, certain factors can remove or alter liability for the dog owner. For example, if the victim provoked the animal or was trespassing on the property, the owner may not be automatically held liable. However, the dog owner may still be responsible for paying medical bills, lost wages, property damage, and pain and suffering. Other factors can also influence liability, including dogs handled in a professional capacity as part of law enforcement or military programs. There are three types of laws that impose liability on dog owners: Dog-bite statute - Under this statute, the dog owner is held liable for any injury or property damage caused by the dog. This statute is upheld automatically, and it's not based on provocation. Violation of this statute results in strict liability rather than negligence. One-bite rule - In some jurisdictions, liability is based on history and knowledge of previous vicious incidents. However, some states have moved away from the one-bite rule, with owners held responsible for any injury regardless of history. Negligence laws - Situations that involve potential negligence can be complex, with legal support often required. The dog owner or person caring for the dog is liable when the injury occurred due to unreasonable care in the context of controlling the dog. Liability for third parties In most cases, regardless of where the attack occurred, the dog owner is legally responsible for all bites and injuries caused by their animal. However, someone else can be held liable together with the dog owner in the following situations: A third party who had care or control over the dog, including dog sitters and dog walkers A dog owner who is less than 18 years of age A property owner (dog owner's landlord) who knew the dog was dangerous but didn't act Liability for third parties is related to common law and strict liability rules. Under common law, liability is based on negligence, either from the dog owner or a third party who is caring for the dog. This also applies to strict liability cases, where dog-bite statutes define an "owner" as someone who's keeping a dog. This includes the person who owns the dog or anyone else who harbors the animal. Differences between states In the US, most jurisdictions impose statutory strict liability for dog attacks. This makes the dog owner legally liable to the victim by default. Dog-bite statutes that impose strict liability date back to the 1700s, and they're still used in the majority of states. The one-bite rule applies in just 14 states: ID, ND, SD, WY, NV, KS, NM, TX, AR, MS, VA, MD, VT, and AK. In another five states, mixed rules apply, including laws based on negligence: OR, NY, TN, NC, and GA. If you need legal assistance in  Peoria, Illinois  or elsewhere in Illinois, we are here to help. Please reach out to us if you were the victim of a dog attack.
More Posts